Summary:
Swartville owed TD Bank $1,615,000, secured by real property and guaranteed by the three principals of the company. Following default and rather than foreclosing on the property, TD Bank brought suit against the guarantors. Swartville then filed Chapter 11, proposing to surrender the real property in satisfaction of the debt. TD Bank objected that such plan was not filed in good faith, as it was intended solely to benefit the guarantors by forcing TD Bank to take the real property in reduction of the debt.
Applying the two-prong good faith test dev
Summary:
Dickerson filed Chapter 7 pro se, initially failing to disclose and exempt a pending lawsuit against Bell Partners for personal injuries and pecuniary losses. The Debtor eventually claimed the lawsuit as fully exempt, but the Trustee objected to the exemption of an pecuniary losses
Dickerson, the Trustee and Bell Partners subsequently agreed, both on the telephone and in emails, to settle the lawsuit for $15,000, consisting of $10,000 in exempt personal injury proceeds and $5,000 for pecuniary losses, that would be available for the bankruptcy estate. Di
The Debtor sought approval of the settlement of an Equitable Distribution, conducted in Maine, that would have allowed her to transfer funds into exempt IRAs, arguing that an Equitable Distribution rights are not property rights and therefore not an asset of the bankruptcy estate. The Trustee objected.
Summary:
Rudlow, the attorney for WFS, brought a replevin action against Rawlinson and her nephew, for a vehicle which the nephew owned, subject to a lien held by WFS. Rawlinson was not a party to the note, but Rudlow believed Rawlinson either had possession of the vehicle or knew its location, since her nephew lived with her. Rawlinson brought a FDCPA claim in response.
The 4th Circuit began by holding that, just as, following Wilson v. Draper & Goldberg, PLLC, 443 F.3d 373, 375-76 (4th Cir.
Finch leased a room from Campus Habitat and asserted that Campus Habitat breached their lease, causing her to move out. Campus Habitat responded and counterclaimed, receiving judgment for damages and, pursuant to the lease, attorneys’ fees.
Summary:
At the foreclosure hearing before the New Hanover County Clerk of Court, the Pughes filed an Election of Arbitration. The Clerk of Court did not act on this, instead finding that the Substitute Trustee had meet the six statutory requirements to proceed with foreclosure. The Pughes appealed to Superior Court, where the judge again found that the requirements for foreclosure had been met and declined to rule on the request for arbitration.
The Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that both the Clerk of Court and, on appeal, the Superior Court had scope only
Summary:
Watkins provided a letter to Latigo Investments and the other plaintiffs, that he owned RDS Diversity Capital Corp ("RDS"), which had obtained $30 million in financing from Waddell and Reed, Inc., for the purchase of an ownership interest in MB2, a NASCAR team. RDS had never, in fact, been organized, did not have the ability to close the financing with Waddell and Reed, and had no ability to obtain other financing.
Accordingly, the bankruptcy court found that Watkins had acted "with substantial certainty that harm would re
Summary:
Dark brought an adversary proceeding seeking to have the debt of Thomas declared nondischargable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). Thomas moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that "a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S.
Prior to the Debtor’s discharge, the Tortoretes were granted two extensions of time for the purpose of reviewing documents provided in connection with the Rule 2004 Examination of Cornerstone and to consider filing a complaint objecting to discharge. When no objection was filed, the Debtor was granted a discharge. Nearly one year later, the Tortoretes sought to reopen the Debtor’s case to o
