Tag: pro se

E.D.N.C.: Collins v. First Financial Services- Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Orders

Summary:

Ms. Collins, representing herself pro se, in an action alleging multiple claims arising from a mortgage lending scheme by the defendants failed to comply with multiple orders regarding discovery. Upon the motions of the defendants, the district court (lamenting that no attorneys from the Pro Bono Panel had stepped up to assist Ms. Collins) applied the four-part test from Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 269 F.3d 305, 348 (4th Cir. 2001) to determine what sanctions to impose:

1) whether the non-complying party acted in bad faith;
(2) the amount of prejudice that noncompliance caused the adversary;
(3) the need for deterrence of the particular sort of non-compliance; and
(4) whether less drastic sanctions would have been effective.… Read More

Tagged with: , ,

W.D.N.C.: Garvey v. Seterus – FDCPA Demand for Verification Limited to Statutory Requirements; Statute of Limitations for FDCPA

Summary:

Leaving aside the multiple foreclosure proceedings and subsequent appeals, Mr. Garvey eventually filed a short-lived, pro se Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Attorneys for Seterus filed a Notice of Appearance and Objection to Confirmation. Mr. Garvey then sent a demand to the attorneys, as debt collectors, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692g, provide verification under penalty of perjury to substantiate that the alleged debt was owed to Seterus and further stating that failure to comply within seven days would constitute a waiver of all claims against him.

Following the dismissal of the bankruptcy, Mr. Garvey commenced suit in federal district court, which held that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.… Read More

Tagged with: , , ,

N.C. Court of Appeals: In re Wilson- Failure to Enjoin Foreclosure Pending Appeal

Summary:

The pro se Debtor attacked a foreclosure on several fronts, first appealing the Clerk of Court authorization of the foreclosure to the Superior Court and then to the Court of Appeals.  The Debtor did not file a motion to stay the foreclosure pending the appeal and the property was sold at auction.

The Court of Appeals held that the foreclosure auction mooted the subsequent appeal, leaving nothing to be heard.

For a copy of the opinion, please see:

Wilson- Failure to Enjoin Foreclosure Pending Appeal.pdf Read More

Tagged with: , , ,
Top