As the FDCPA is concerned “with the substance of the transaction as opposed to the form”, the 4th Circuit held that even assuming that the original 2004 debt was a commercial loan, the later 2006 debt, used to satisfy the original obligation, was a consumer loan as it concerned the Plaintiff's personal finances, his personal residence, and was taken out in his own name.
This case may also have value in determining whether a debtor "debts are primarily consumer debts" under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b).
Smith v. EVB & Berkeley.PDF
Blog comments