Judge Warren’s most recent opinion in In re Sugar (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2025) follows remand from both the U.S. District Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The case began with the dismissal of Christine Sugar’s Chapter 13 in 2023, coupled with a five-year nationwide bar on refiling, after she sold her residence without prior court approval in violation of E.D.N.C. Local Bankruptcy Rule 4002-1(g)(4).
Judge Terrence W. Boyle of the Eastern District of North Carolina granted preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement in a consumer protection case brought against Carolina Lease Management Group, LLC and CTH Rentals, LLC (but notably not Old Hickory Buildings, LLC, which remains a non-settling defendant).
Judge Pamela McAfee overruled a Chapter 7 trustee’s objection to a North Carolina debtor’s homestead exemption claimed in real estate located not in Wake County, but in Corentyne Berbice, Guyana. The case highlights two recurring issues in exemption law:
(1) whether a spouse living abroad may qualify as a “dependent” for purposes of N.C.G.S. § 1C-1601(a)(1), and
In this post-confirmation Chapter 11 dispute, the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granted a motion by Fourth Elm Construction, LLC to compel arbitration and stay the adversary proceeding brought by the debtor, JSmith Civil, LLC. The adversary complaint asserted state-law claims for breach of contract and quantum meruit arising from a terminated subcontracting agreement. Fourth Elm relied on the contract’s Article 24 arbitration clause, invoking Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).
Judge Louise Flanagan ruled on two key post-certification motions in this putative class action concerning alleged abusive debt collection practices targeting North Carolina homeowners’ associations (HOAs).
In this extensive Chapter 11 adversary proceeding, the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled on cross-motions for summary judgment concerning a Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) agreement between the debtor, Williams Land Clearing, and Apex Funding Source. The court held that the MCA was a loan, not a true sale, and that it was criminally usurious under New York law with an effective interest rate of 101.1% per annum. As such, the MCA agreement was void ab initio.
