Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: In re Goodman- Setoff of Social Security Funds

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 20 June, 2012
Summary: In December 2010, the Social Security Administration the Debtor of an alleged overpayment of SSI benefits, seeking repayment of $11,585. In March 2011, the Debtor received a "Notice of Award" for Social Security Disability ("SSD") benefits of $1,001.00 beginning March 2011. Also in March 2011, the Debtor was notified of SSA's decision that she was entitled to receive a monthly payment of $674.00 and retroactive SSI benefits from May 2010 through March 2011 totaling $7,414.00. Then on March 24, 2011, SSA intercepted the debtor's $7,414.00 in retroactive SSI benefits, which it applied toward the $11,585.00 overpayment. The Debtor filed bankruptcy on April 7, 2011, and subsequently sought turnover of the $7,414.00 seized within 90 days of the filing of her petition. 11 U.S.C. § 553(a) recognizes and preserves the right to setoff that exists under applicable state law where the following four conditions are met: (1) the creditor must hold a "claim" against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the bankruptcy case; (2) the creditor must owe a "debt" to the debtor that arose prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case; (3) both the "claim" and the "debt" must be mutual; and (4) both the "claim" and the "debt" are each valid and enforceable. § 553(b), however, expressly prohibits any creditor from improving its position through a setoff within the 90-days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition and allows a Trustee to seek turnover of such funds. (§ 522(h) allows the Debtor to exercise the trustee's power to recover property improperly setoff under § 553(b) if such property could be exempted.) The existence of an insufficiency, i.e. the amount owed to the creditor exceed the amount owed by the creditor, presumes that there is a mutual debt between the parties. Here there was no mutual until March of 2011, when the SSA did first decided that it owed the Debtor $7,414.00, but as that date was withing 90-days of the filing of the petition, the Debtor was entitled under §553(b) to return of the seized funds. For a copy of the opinion, please see: Goodman- Setoff of Social Security Funds.pdf

Blog comments

Category
North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
Eastern District

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz