Summary:
Following Hice v. Hi-Mil, Inc., 301 N.C. 647, 273 S.E.2d 268 (1981), the Court of Appeals (in its third opinion in this case) held that in an action for reformation of a written instrument the moving party must show by clear, cogent and convincing evidence that there was " not just a mistake on its
own part, but a mutual mistake on the part of all parties."
For a copy of the opinion, please see:
Inland Harbors HOA v. St. Joseph’s Marina (Inland Harbor III)- Reformation of Deed of Trust.pdf
Category
Blog comments