Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

N.C. Ct. of App.: Iris Enterprises v. Five Wins- Foreclosure Trustee Bound by Judicial Determination of Claim Balance

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 5 August, 2014
Summary: Following failed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Five Wins obtained a declaratory judgment against Iris finding that Iris owed $894,711.24 to redeem real property from foreclosure. After Five Wins bid $875,000.00 for the properties, WA Ventures made a successful upset bid at the subsequent foreclosure in the amount of $918,750.00 and then assigned the bid to Five Wins. (It would be guessed that Five Wins bought the assignment of he bid rather than making another higher bid for the property at foreclosure.) The Trustee disbursed $856,286.33 to Five Wins for the remaining redemption amount and the remainder to Five Wins as part of the “secured obligation.” The trial court, on rehearing of the original declaratory judgment, awarded the remaining funds to Iris and Five Wins appealed. The Court of Appeals held that the “redemption amount is the amount of the indebtedness.” And while the disbursements from a foreclosure “are within the sole province of the trustee[,]” In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Executed by Ferrell Bros. Farm, Inc., 118 N.C. App. 458, 461, 455 S.E.2d 676, 678 (1995), “the trustee of a property in foreclosure lacks authority to overrule a superior court judge.” Commentary: While the treatment of claims in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy is contingent upon the Debtor receiving a discharge, it is not necessarily true that the determination of the amount of a claim, including the disallowance of portions of a claim, i.e. pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 45-91, are contingent on a discharge. This case would support the contention that such determinations are binding. For a copy of the opinion, please see: Iris Enterprises v. Five Wins- Foreclosure Trustee Bound by Judicial Determination of Claim Balance

Blog comments

Blog tags
res judicata
Category
NC Court of Appeals
NC Courts

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz