Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

4th Cir.: Old Republic v. Shulman Rogers- Mutual Mistake in Deed of Trust

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 2 April, 2021

Summary:

Heinz and Susan Georg refinanced their home, which was owned by them as tenants by the entireties, with First Horizon. Only Mr. Georg was, however, listed as a borrower on the mortgage note and, more consequentially, as a grantor on the Deed of Trust. Old Republic, believing that both Georgs signed the Deed of Trust, issued title insurance to First Horizon.

When Mr. Georg defaulted on the mortgage in 2009 and First Horizon was unable to foreclose, Old Republic retained Morton Faller at Shulman Rogers to seek a reformation of the Deed of Trust in Maryland Circuit Court. This was denied because there was no showing that there was a mutual mistake between the parties, since Mrs. Georg was not knowledgeable about the peculiar requirements of Tenancy by the Entireties. Specifically, for mutual mistake both parties must have understood the mistake which was made. Additionally, the state court found that Old Republic lacked standing to raise equitable subrogation.

Faller filed a Notice of Appeal, which was dismissed as untimely upon the motion of the Georgs.

Old Republic then again in 2013, with new counsel, sought reformation of the Deed of Trust, which was denied based on res judicata.

In 2018, Old Republic brought suit for legal malpractice against Faller and Shulman Rogers. The district court found (and the Court of Appeals affirmed) that the untimely appeal was not malpractice, as the state court determination that there was no mutual mistake was support both by the evidence and legal precedent. As that decision was not clearly erroneous, any appeal would have been unsuccessful, even if timely filed. Then having reached the merits of the case regarding the lack of mutual mistake, Old Republic could not establish legal malpractice for the failure to preserve the question of standing on equitable subrogation.

Commentary:

This case is tremendously useful for showing that mutual mistake in the drafting of a Deed of Trust requires that all parties understand the consequences of the asserted intention. For unsophisticated consumers, this is almost certainly never the case.

For a copy of the opinion, please click here:

Old-Republic-v.-Shulman-RogersDownload

Blog comments

Blog tags
deed of trust
Category
4th Circuit Court of Appeals

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz