Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

E.D.N.C.: Rouse v. Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc.- Liquidation Test for Hardship Discharge Based on Values at Confirmation

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 13 December, 2021

Summary:

Mr. Rouse filed a Chapter 12 bankruptcy in November 2017, with a plan negotiated with his creditors, including Nutrien, being confirmed on May 23, 2017, with general unsecured creditors to receive $50,687.

Then on June 27, 2020, Mr. Rouse was shot multiple times by an assailant who murdered two other people before killing himself. Due to his devastating injuries, Mr. Rouse spent more than a month hospitalized, required multiple surgeries and on-going physical therapy, all of which will prevent him from farming for the foreseeable future.

Mr. Rouse, who had paid $43,465.64 to general unsecured creditors, then sought a hardship discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. ยง 1228(b) and Nutrien objected, arguing that Mr. Rouse was $7,221.36 short of meeting the liquidation test. Mr. Rouse urge a reanalysis of the liquidation test, taking into account the $18,000 paid to his attorneys. The bankruptcy court rejected this argument, as $10,000 in attorney's fees had already been incorporated into the liquidation test at confirmation, and denied the hardship discharge finding that Mr. Rouse owed $11,339.62 to general unsecured creditors, which included accrued interest.

The district court affirmed, finding that "the statutory language recognizes the timing of the confirmation of a plan of reorganization, i.e., before the plan's effective date, versus a motion for discharge from that plan, i.e., after the plan's effective date." Accordingly, the liquidation test for both confirmation and hardship discharge look at the assets at the time of confirmation.

Commentary:

It is unclear from the Claims Registry how much of the $11,339.62 that Mr. Rouse owed would have been paid to Nutrien, but it hopefully is enough to justify opposing this hardship discharge for a victim of traumatic violence.

That aside, this decision should help both Chapter 12 and Chapter 13 debtors with hardship discharges, as an increase in the value of assets during the case should likewise not be considered.

For a copy of the opinion, please see:

Rouse-v.-Nutien-AG-SolutionsDownload

Blog comments

Category
Eastern District
Federal Cases

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, ยฉ 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz