Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: In re Cook- Mortgage Deduction on the Means Test not Capped at IRS Local Standard

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 23 January, 2022

Summary:

The Cooks filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy and, being above median income, were required to calculate their "projected disposable income" using Official Form 122C-2. As their plan provided for the retention of their home and cure and maintenance of the on-going mortgage, they deducted their monthly mortgage payment of $2,233.34 from the Means Test, despite the IRS Local Standard for mortgage expenses being only $1,098.00.

The Trustee objected, following In re Harris, 522, B.R. 804 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2014), which held that “that the home and vehicle allowances serve only to operate as a ‘cap’ on the amount the Debtors may deduct, when their average monthly secured home and vehicle payments exceed the Standard amounts.”

Here, however, the bankruptcy judge rejected that reasoning, finding that "[i]n enacting the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) in 2005, Congress intentionally withdrew the discretion of bankruptcy judges to determine what expenses were “reasonable” for above-median-income debtors." As such, 11 U.S.C. §707(b)(2)(A)(iii) was unambiguous when it directs that:

The debtor’s average monthly payments on account of secured debts shall be calculated as the sum of—
(I) the total of all amounts scheduled as contractually due to secured creditors in each month of the 60 months following the date of the filing of the petition . . .. (Emphasis added.)

Accordingly, despite the "occasional peculiarity", as Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., N.A., 562 U.S. 61 (2011) described this potential outcome, this deduction was mandated by Congress and it was "not the function of this court to mold its decisions to policy concerns."

Commentary:

This was one of the last decisions by Judge Stephani Humrickhouse before her retirement and, to the extent that it created a split within the Eastern District case law (and this case has been certified for direct appeal to the 4th Circuit), the consumer bar is grateful, as it is for all of her years of service.

For a copy of the opinion, please see:

In-re-CookDownload

Blog comments

Blog tags
Means Test
Category
North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
Eastern District

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz