Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blogs

N.C. Ct. of App: Longphre v. KT Fin.- Date for Accrual of Interest

Profile picture for user Ed Boltz
By Ed Boltz, 13 March, 2024

Summary:

The Longphres  loaned KT Financial $330,000 by two separate promissory notes with 30% interest  and specified “[a]ll accrued interest and unpaid principal” was due one year after the notes were executed.  The notes also allowed the Longphres to collect attorney's fees pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 6-21.2 if KT Financial defaulted.  

Surprise twist-  KT Financial defaulted.

The Longphres demanded repayment of principal and accrued interest on the notes for a total of $546,912.32, eventually bringing suit.  KT Financial argued that the notes were interest free during the first year,  with the trial court agreeing and reducing the amount owed to $450,156.16,  but also awarding attorneys fees of 15%  or $67,523.42.  

Second surprise twist-  Everybody  appealed

The N.C Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that as the contract was silent as to when interest began to accrue,  N.C.G.S.. § 24-3(1)  controlled and provides that:

All bonds, bills, notes, bills of exchange, liquidated and settled accounts shall bear interest from the time they become due . . . unless it is specially expressed that interest is not to accrue until a time mentioned in the said writings or securities.

As the date the notes came due was after one year, that is when interest commenced.

The NCCOA  rejected KT Financial's argument regarding the award of attorneys fees as without merit.

Commentary:

While KT Financial's argument regarding the award of attorneys fees was without merit,  since those fees were capped at 15% of the outstanding balance,  raising that argument on appeal was without much risk and would seem to have bled the Longphres.  Presumably their lawyers were still charging for the appeal win or lose. Meaning that even had  the Longphres been successful, the net recovery would have been substantially less than their unrequited desire for $96,756.16  in accrued interest.

 

To read a copy of the transcript, please see:

Blog comments

Attachment
Document
longphre_v._kt_fin._llc.pdf (116.26 KB)
Category
NC Court of Appeals
NC Courts

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz