Summary:
Vaughn, who represented himself, filed a complex, convoluted and confusing complaint against Navy Federal with numerous claims, including violations of various U.S. and foreign statutes, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and allegations of discrimination.
The court dismissed each claim due to a lack of factual support, failure to specify how Navy Federal violated particular statutes, or because the statutes did not provide a private cause of action. Vaughn also failed to establish the existence of a fiduciary duty or contract with Navy Federal. Additionally, his motion for default judgment was denied as Navy Federal had responded appropriately to the case. The court found Vaughn’s remaining motions moot and dismissed the case.
With proper attribution, please share this post.
To read a copy of the transcript, please see:
Blog comments