Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in
By Ed Boltz, 19 May, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Rutledge v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.- State Law Claims for Failure Related to HAMP Modification

Summary: The Debtor, after various alleged inconsistencies and shenanigans by Wells Fargo in application of her payments and insurance proceeds, as well as failures in the review of her loan modification application, filed bankruptcy and brought suit alleging, among other causes of action, breaches of contract and duties of good faith & fair dealing and fiduciary duty, fraud and constructive fraud, and violations of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practice Act. Wells Fargo sought dismissal for failing to state a claim. Following Wigod v.
By Ed Boltz, 19 May, 2014

Bankr. W.D.N.C.: In re Nelson- Denial of Objection to Conversion from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13

Summary: The Chapter 7 Trustee discovered that the Female Debtor was the 50% beneficiary of her late father's springing trust, with her share being worth approximately $100,000, that had not been listed in the petition. The Trustee also cam to believe, based on a valuation by a realtor, that real property valued at $10,000 by the Debtors was actually worth as much as $44,900. After discovery and belated disclosure of these, the Debtors sought to convert their case to Chapter 13, with the Trustee objecting.
By Ed Boltz, 19 May, 2014

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: In re Amerson- Violation of the Automatic Stay; Termination of Automatic Stay in an Individual Chapter 11

Summary: Despite having received notice of the bankruptcy filing and notice of the proof of claims deadline well before the expiration of the deadline and approximately thirteen months prior to confirmation of the Amerson's Second Amended Plan, Flanders, who was represented by counsel during much toe the Chapter 11 proceeding, did not take any action in the bankruptcy proceeding to request relief from the automatic stay or to file a proof of claim.
By Ed Boltz, 19 May, 2014

Study- Twomey, Tara: Crossing Paths: The Intersection of Reverse Mortgages and Bankruptcy

Abstract: The senior population of the United States is expected to grow rapidly over the next twenty years. Rather than enjoying their golden years, increasingly older Americans are struggling with less income, greater debt and insufficient retirement savings. The average amount of debt held by seniors has soared over the last decade. Many now rely on credit cards to cover their basic living expenses. Rising mortgage debt has compromised the use of home equity as a retirement nest egg. There are few easy solutions.
By Ed Boltz, 7 May, 2014

Law Review: Gotberg, Brook- Conflicting Preferences: Avoidance Proceedings in Bankruptcy Liquidation and Reorganization

Abstract: The law of preferential transfers permits the trustee of a bankruptcy estate to avoid transfers made by the debtor to a creditor on account of a prior debt in the 90 days leading up to the bankruptcy proceeding. The standard for avoiding these preferential transfers is one of strict liability, on the rationale that preference actions exist to ensure that all general creditors of the bankruptcy estate recover the same proportional amount, regardless of the debtor’s intent to favor any one creditor or the creditor’s intent to be so favored.
By Ed Boltz, 6 May, 2014

N.C. Court of Appeals: Hensel v. Xerox Business Services- Accord and Satisfaction of Student Loan

Summary: Hensel had student loans of more that $90,000. In November 2012, he received two bills for late fees in the total amount of $68.28. In response, on December 9, 2012, Hensel sent XBS a check for $68.28 attached to a letter that asserted the late fees violated the FDCPA, that assessment of the late fees had harmed his ability to purchase a home, and proposing to release his claims if XBS cancelled his remaining student loans, with cashing of the $68.28 to constitute acceptance.
By Ed Boltz, 5 May, 2014

4th Circuit: Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, L.L.C- No Invalidation of Arbitration for Non-Whistle Blower Claims by Dodd-Frank

Summary: Santoro brought suit against Accenture, alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act.
By Ed Boltz, 5 May, 2014

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: Angell v. Larabee ( In re Tanglewood Farms)- Cure Payments not in the Ordinary Course of Business

Summary: The Trustee sought turnover of funds from the Mary Larabee, the wife of the cousin of the 100% owner of Tanglewood Farms) as prefential transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547, 550 and 551.
By Ed Boltz, 5 May, 2014

Bankr. W.D.N.C.: Murrell v. First Horizon (In re Durrell)- Judicial Recusal not Required when Party is Represented by Former Law Clerk

 Summary: Prior to filing their first bankruptcy, Murrell deeded his home to the Phoenician Irrevocable Trust, in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent foreclosure by Bayview, now First Horizon. When the foreclosure sale was allowed, Murrell filed Chapter 13 on the 9th day of the 10-day upset period, but since the property was no longer owned by the Murrell, the bankruptcy court held that foreclosure was not stayed by their filing.
By Ed Boltz, 5 May, 2014

E.D.N.C.: Homeward Residential v. First Bank- Failure to Cancel Equity Line

Summary: In February of 2006, the Coopers granted a Deed of Trust for a home equity line to First Bank. Later, in December of 2006, the Coopers refinanced their home with a Deed of Trust, currently held by Homeward, paying of the equity line to First Bank. The closing attorney at that time requested that First Bank terminate the home equity line, but First Bank instead allowed the Coopers to draw an additional $87,598 before they ultimately filed Chapter 13.

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page
  • …
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • …
  • Next page
  • Last page
Drupal blog posts

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz