Summary: Dillon, a North Carolina resident, obtained five loans over the internet from lenders based offshore or on Indian reservations (“internet lenders”) with interest rates ranging from 139% to over 700% and, in some cases, thousands of dollars in finance charges. Mr. Dillon asserted that these loans violated North Carolina’s usury statute and various other state laws.

Abstract: Although the collection of college student loans centers this article, some background precedes its main topic. It begins by defining and distinguishing federal and private student loans. Next is repayment of loans, postponing repayment through deferment, forbearance, extensions, and public-interest assistance and cancellation. Perkins loan deferment, forbearance, and cancellation follow.

Abstract:  The division of responsibility between state and federal authorities in bankruptcy is complex. The U.S. Constitution cedes the power to pass bankruptcy laws to the federal government. For political reasons, however, since 1867 the federal bankruptcy law has deferred to one degree or another to the states with respect to the designation of property exempt from administration in a bankruptcy case.

Abstract: When Congress amended the Bankruptcy Code in 2005 through the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), it mandated that individual consumer debtors undergo two debtor education courses, one as a condition precedent to filing for bankruptcy relief, and a second for later receiving a discharge of indebtedness.

Abstract: Most individual debtors file for bankruptcy relief with honest intentions. Nonetheless, there is also an underside to the American bankruptcy law system that often goes unreported and ignored in the scholarly literature, namely, the commission of fraud by debtors who seek protection under the Bankruptcy Code. One of the ways in which fraud upon the bankruptcy system occurs is when debtors intentionally conceal assets from the bankruptcy process.

Summary: Mr. Jarrett held a one-half remainder interest in real property, with the other one-half remainder interest held by his sister and the life estate in favor of his mother. The tax value of the property is $118,500, with a $42,362 mortgage. Mr. Jarrett valued his fractional interest at $7,110 and exempted $4,568.28. The Court held that Chapter 7 Trustee could not sell an entire interest in the property free and clear of the interest of the life tenant. See In re Sargent, 337 B.R. 661 (Bankr. N.D.

Summary: The Joneses brought a breach of contract claim against Fulton Bank, alleging that Fulton Bank failed to send them a proper thirty-day pre-acceleration notice. See Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Simmons, 654 S.E.2d 898, 901 (Va. 2008). The Joneses also challenged the appointment by Fulton Bank of a Substitute Trustee with instructions to commence foreclosure as not complying with the Deed of Trust.

Summary: In 2007, Bane’s company, Aequitas-Energy, Inc., purchased fifty acres of land (the Angel Lane Property) in Roanoke County, Virginia, from Bane’s mother, Martha Bane, who was granted at $400,000 mortgage against the property. This mortgage was never recorded and the later mortgage to Community Trust Bank was accordingly superior. Bane, having fallen into default on the Coummunity Trust mortgage and facing foreclosure, had the property transferred into his name and filed bankruptcy in 2010, the day before the foreclosure sale.

Summary: Stephens fell delinquent on her mortgage with HSBC and, prior to HSBC taking any action, sought a declaratory judgment that her mortgage contract was void ab initio, as it contained a waiver of her appraisement rights under South Carolina Code § 29-3-680.

Summary: The Debtor served a copy of a Motion to Avoid the Judgment Lien held by Main Street Acquisition Corp. at its place of business and also by serving its attorney in the state court action.