Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
By Ed Boltz, 5 August, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Abbington Partners, L.L.C.- Dismissal of Corporate Bankruptcy Case filed without Attorney Representation

Summary: Corporate Debtor Abbington Partners, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy without representation by counsel. It had previously a bankruptcy in Massachusetts, which had been dismissed for lack of attorney representation. Reiterating that “[i]t has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.” In re Tamojira, Inc., 20 F. App’x 133, 133-34 (4th Cir.
By Ed Boltz, 19 May, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Rutledge v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.- State Law Claims for Failure Related to HAMP Modification

Summary: The Debtor, after various alleged inconsistencies and shenanigans by Wells Fargo in application of her payments and insurance proceeds, as well as failures in the review of her loan modification application, filed bankruptcy and brought suit alleging, among other causes of action, breaches of contract and duties of good faith & fair dealing and fiduciary duty, fraud and constructive fraud, and violations of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practice Act. Wells Fargo sought dismissal for failing to state a claim. Following Wigod v.
By Ed Boltz, 28 April, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Walter v. Freeway Foods- Application of Attorney-Client Privilege if Attorney is Unlicensed

Summary: Walter sought discovery relating to communications between Waffle House and Jonathan Waller, who had served as general counsel to Waffle House since 2001. Waffle House, asserting attorney-client privilege, directed Waller not to respond. The difficulty, however, was that Waller provided legal services for Waffle House in Georgia, but only held an inactive law license in Illinois and no where else.
By Ed Boltz, 7 April, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Bolden- Service Pursuant to Rule 7004 on an Officer or Managing Agent

Summary: The Debtor served a copy of a Motion to Avoid the Judgment Lien held by Main Street Acquisition Corp. at its place of business and also by serving its attorney in the state court action.
By Ed Boltz, 27 March, 2014

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Styers- Motion to Dismiss as Alternative to Motion for Relief from Stay

Summary: Chapter 13 Debtors had fallen behind on payment under their confirmed plan, wherein the mortgage held be Wells Fargo was paid directly by the Debtors. Instead of following the more customary path of seeking relief from the automatic stay, Wells Fargo instead sought dismissal of the Chapter 13 case. The Motion to Dismiss was resolved by bringing the payments “inside” the Chapter 13 plan, but the parties could not agree on the allowance of attorney’s fees in the amount of $350.00.
By Ed Boltz, 20 May, 2013

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Assasepa- Judicial Recusal

Summary: The Debtor sought to have the bankruptcy judge recuse herself, based on an alleged financial interest held by the judge in JP Morgan Chase, a party in an adversary proceeding.
By Ed Boltz, 20 May, 2013

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Clean Burn Fuels v. Purdue Bioenergy (In re Clean Burn Fuels)- UCC and Delivery of Goods; Parol Evidence Rule

Summary: Clean Burn Fuels (CBF) operated a pant that converted corn supplied by Purdue Bionery (Purdue) into ethanol. The agreement between the parties provided that Purdue would retain ownership of the corn until it was delivered to CBF, defined as the when it passed over a weigh belt, the final stage before the conversion of the corn into ethanol began.
By Ed Boltz, 26 March, 2013

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Gilley- Dischargablity of SEC Settlements under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19)

Summary: The SEC filed a complaint against the Debtor and two other individuals in 2005 alleging they had engaged in a $60 million Ponzi scheme, specifically alleging that the Debtor unlawfully sold unregistered securities, was not registered as a broker-dealer when selling certain billboards, and failed to disclose material information to investors. In 2006, the Debtor and the SEC filed a consent judgment wherein the Debtor agreed to, among other terms, disgorge nearly $2 million.
By Ed Boltz, 26 March, 2013

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Schafer v. Hilliard (In re Royal Tours)- Avoidance of Payments if Not for A Debt

Summary: Lee and Patsy Hilliard were married in 1975 and both served as officers of Royal Tours. Following their separation in 2008, the couple entered into a Separation Agreement whereby Patsy Hilliard resigned her position with Royal Tours and accepted a cash payment from Royal Tours in lieu of an Equitable Distribution consisting of 108 monthly payments of $3,500. The Chapter 7 Trustee alleged that the twelve payments made prior to the bankruptcy filing were preferences pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547.
By Ed Boltz, 25 March, 2013

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Carpenter- Dismissal following Multiple Refilings

Summary: The Debtor had filed four case within nine months. The first was dismissed for failure to obtain credit counseling, although no schedules had been filed either nor had the Debtor attended the §341 Meeting of Creditors. The second case was dismissed for failure to file schedules, attend the §341 Meeting of Creditors, or make any payments. The third case was voluntarily dismissed following partial payment of the filing fee and filing of schedules, but still without attendance at the §341 Meeting of Creditors or any plan payment.

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 8
  • Next page
Middle District

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz