Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

fdcpa

By Ed Boltz, 23 January, 2022

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Swink v. Fannie Mae- Actual Damages Sufficient for §524(i), RESPA and FDCPA Claims

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 11 December, 2021

W.D.N.C.: Bradley v. Progress Residential Prop. Manager, LLC- Failure to Brief 12(b)(6) Motion

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 13 April, 2021

W.D.N.C: Carter v. Capital One- Complying with IRS Levy is not Debt Collection

Summary:

Ms. Carter brought suit against her bank, Capital One, for complying with an IRS levy by taking $1,279.41 from her account, arguing that Capital One had violated the FDCPA. Finding that "an obligation to pay that 'arises solely by operation of law' is not a debt covered by the FDCPA" the district court dismissed the case.

Commentary:

By Ed Boltz, 27 January, 2021

W.D.N.C.- Bryan v. Allied Interstate: FDCPA and Blocked Caller Identification

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 3 September, 2020

4th Circuit: Bender v. Elmore & Throop, P.C. - Statute of Limitations for FDCPA Claims run from each violation

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 5 February, 2019

Law Review: Bruce, Kara J. and Sickler, Alexandra, Private Remedies and Access to Justice in a Post-Midland World

Abstract:

Over the past several years, chapter 13 debtors have used the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) as a tool to challenge debt buyers who file massive numbers of proofs of claim for debt for which the statute of limitations has run. In Midland Funding v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that filing a proof of claim for time-barred debt does not violate the FDCPA.

By Ed Boltz, 9 October, 2018

4th Circuit: Richardson v. Shapiro & Brown- Res Judicata Inapplicable

Summary:Ā 
In apparent connection with a foreclosure,  Richardson, acting pro se, brought and FDCPA suit for failure to adequately verify debts under 15 U.S.C.  § 1692(g) against Shapiro & Brown, Nationstar Mortgage and Rushmore Loan Management.  In a very terse one-page memorandum opinion, the district court dismissed the case due to res judicata and the statute of limitations.  It can be surmised  only from the brief filed by Nationstar at the district court with its Motion to Dismiss, that Richardson had previously raised FDCPA claims in an at
By Ed Boltz, 4 October, 2018

M.D.N.C.: Koepplinger v. Seterus- FDCPA Violation for Threat to Accelerate Mortgage

Summary:
Koepplinger, as a putative class representative, alleged that Seterus would send North Carolina residents who were more than 45 day delinquent on mortgage payments its ā€œNC Final Letterā€, which stated, in pertinent part, that:
ā€œIf full payment of the default amount is not received by us . . .
By Ed Boltz, 25 August, 2017

W.D.N.C.: Deal v. Trinity Hope Associates, LLC- Default Judgment under FDCPA

Ā  Summary: Default Judgment was entered in favor of Ms. Deal for violations of the FDCPA by Trinity Hope Associates, which failed to respond to the Complaint. Commentary: The only aspect that is interesting is that this is a 10-page opinion finding default, where the defendant did not answer. For a copy of the opinion, please see: Deal v. Trinity Hope Associates, LLC- Default Judgment under FDCPA
By Ed Boltz, 23 August, 2017

E.D.N.C.: Mungo-Craig v. Navient Solutions- Student Loan Servicer not a Debt Collector

Summary: Ms. Mungo-Craig brought suit against Navient, first in state court and then after removal in federal district court, alleging violations of the FDCPA and North Carolina Debt Collection Act. The district court denied her motion to remand, finding that it did have federal question jurisdiction to hear claims brought under the FDCPA and supplemental jurisdiction for the other state law claims, as they arose from the same common nucleus of facts. It then granted the Motion to Dismiss brought by Navient finding that Ms.

Pagination

  • 1
  • Next page
fdcpa

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

Ā 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.0, Ā© 2013-2023 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved.