Summary:

Starting from the case of Murray’s Lessee v.  Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., 59 U.S. (18 How.)  272 (1855), this article looks at the roots of the recent decision in Stern v.  Marshall, 131 S.  Ct.  2594 (2011).  In Murray’s Lessee, the U.S.

Summary: Not quite half-way through this exhaustive opinion, the bankruptcy court, in discussing Stern v.

Summary: The complaint and anser both failed, in contravention of Rules 7008(a) and 7012(b), to state whether the proceeding was core or  non-core, and if non-core, where the parties consented to the bankruptcy court entering  final orders or judgments.  The Court held that, in light of Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct.