Summary:

Mrs. Dev had filed three bankruptcy cases, with the second dismissed on September 12, 2017, and the third filed on February 13, 2018, for the purpose, among others, of stopping the foreclosure of her home by Coastal Federal Credit Union. CFCU brought a Motion for Relief arguing that it lacked adequate protection, that the plan was filed in bad faith, was abusive, and part of a scheme to delay, hinder and defraud CFCU. It sought in rem relief for two years. Ms.

Summary:

Mr. Tyler obtained a mortgage against his home and eventually fell delinquent and faced foreclosure proceedings. Mr. Tyler then filed a pro se Chapter 7 bankruptcy and commenced an adversary proceeding challenging the foreclosure on host of the usual grounds.

Summary:

After filing Ch.  11,  during which case Bank of America filed a Proof of Claim asserting that it was secured by a Deed of Trust owned by Mr.  McGowan and occupied by his then minor daughter, McGowan converted to Ch. 7, received a discharge and the real property was abandoned.

Summary:

Ms.  Broughton,  a persistent and likely pernicious debtor and appellant,  filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proposing to sell for the benefit of her secured creditors the real property she claimed to own in “fee simple absolute; and as trustee for trust for the benefit of her heirs.”  When this plan was rejected, her case was converted to Chapter 7.  The Trustee subsequently obtained an order to sell the property free and clear of liens, but by then Ms.  Broughton opposed such sale,

Summary:

Ms.  Broughton,  a persistent and likely pernicious debtor and appellant,  filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proposing to sell for the benefit of her secured creditors the real property she claimed to own in “fee simple absolute; and as trustee for trust for the benefit of her heirs.”  When this plan was rejected, her case was converted to Chapter 7.  The Trustee subsequently obtained an order to sell the property free and clear of liens, but by then Ms.  Broughton opposed such sale,

Abstract:

Over the past several years, chapter 13 debtors have used the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) as a tool to challenge debt buyers who file massive numbers of proofs of claim for debt for which the statute of limitations has run. In Midland Funding v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that filing a proof of claim for time-barred debt does not violate the FDCPA.

Summary:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: