Summary: This Adversary Proceeding was brought to determine whether a debt was nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B).

Summary: Sixteen months after filing Chapter 13, the Debtor converted to Chapter 7. Capital One, the lienholder against the Debtor’s vehicle, sent the Debtor a reaffirmation agreement, which would have required immediate and full payment of the $16,149.46 balance. Debtor’s counsel requested Capital One negotiate payment terms, but received no response. No reaffirmation on the original contract terms was offered.

Summary: Trustee sought leave to amend a Complaint, which originally alleged fraudulent conveyances under 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 548 and N.C.G.S. § 39.23.4 and unjust enrichment, to add a claim for preferential transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547. The Defendants, having already answered the Complaint, objected. Leave to amend should be denied, therefore, “only when the amendment would be prejudicial to the opposing party, there has been bad faith on the part of the moving party, or the amendment would  be futile.” Edwards v.

Summary: Because of the language of the lease, the bankruptcy court held that a lease had terminated (and consequently could not be assumed in a later bankruptcy case) following default and written demand by  the Leasor of payment of past due rent within 10 days.  Specific notice of termination of the lease was not required. For a copy of the opinion, please see: Salon America- Date of and Requirement for Termina

Summary:

The Trustee sought a 2004 Exam and documents from First Citizens Bank ("FCB"), based on a belief that the Debtor had used a checking account at FCB in connection with a Ponzi scheme.  FCB sought to quash this discovery, arguing that the Trustee was on a fishing expedition to establish claims against FCB in relation to the alleged scheme.

Summary: Despite testimony from the Debtors that they anticipated a substantial decrease in income due to loss of overtime, the court found that it was the circumstances at the time of the hearing that controlled.  Taken with the Debtors’ retention of a boat, their failure to disclose tax refunds,  overtime and bonuses, and continued 401k contributions, dismissal was appropriate. For a copy of the opinion, please see:

Summary: Dark brought an adversary proceeding seeking to have the debt of Thomas declared nondischargable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2).  Thomas moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that "a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. Iqbal,  129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949,  (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S.

Summary: Not quite half-way through this exhaustive opinion, the bankruptcy court, in discussing Stern v.

Summary: The Debtor’s corporation filed Chapter 7 and the Debtor agreed to buy the assets of the corporation from the Chapter 7 Trustee for $3,400.00.  The Trustee was later contacted by an auctioneer, who informed the Trustee that the Debtor was attempting to sell additional corporate assets, that had not be listed in the bankruptcy petition filed by the corporation.  The Debtor eventually did sell these non-disclosed assets for $4,000.00 and also filed his own personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy, with the same Trustee being appointed.  The Trustee eventually settle

Summary: Creditor filed its Proof of Claim six(6) days after the bar date.  Following the objection to the Claim by the Chapter 7 Trustee, the Creditor argued that the claim should be allowed due to excusable neglect.  The bankruptcy court held that under Rule 9006(b)(3),  it had no authority to extend the time to file claims. For a copy of the opinion,  please see: Meredith- No extension of time to file