Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Business Court
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
    • Book Reviews
  • NC Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
By Ed Boltz, 6 August, 2019

N.C. Ct. of Appeals: Everbank v. Hunoval Law Firm- Disqualification of Attorney as Necessary Witness

Summary:

The Hunoval Law Firm and its married partners, Mathias Hunoval and Christina Hunoval, were sued by Everbank for failure to make payments on its lease, with Christina Hunoval representing the Law Firm, as well as herself and her husband. Everbank sought to disqualify Ms. Hunoval as acting as counsel under Rule 3.7 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct because she was a necessary witness. The exceptions to Rule 3.7 allow attorney representation if:

By Ed Boltz, 15 July, 2019

N.C. Ct. of Appeals: In re Davis- Notice of Intent to Foreclose on Repeat Foreclosure; Forgery

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 15 July, 2019

N.C. Ct. of Appeals: Wells Fargo Bank v. Stocks- Statute of Limitation for Reformation of Deed of Trust

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 9 July, 2019

N.C. Ct. Of Appeals: MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Curnin- Action to Quiet Title Due to Insufficient Property Description

Summary:

Curnin granted a Deed of Trust originally to Bank of America, but now held by MTGLQ, with a property description which included the property’s lot number and the phase of the development (“STAGE I”)but without any reference to the book and page numbers where a title searcher could find the map recorded in the Brunswick County. MTGLQ brought an action to quiet title and to reform the Deed of Trust to include the full reference.

By Ed Boltz, 9 July, 2019

N.C. Ct. Of Appeals: Bank of America v. McFarland- More than Mere Allegation of Fraud is Required to Defeat Summary Judgment.

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 19 February, 2019

N.C. Ct. of Appeals- In re Aaron’s, Inc.: Tax Status of Leased Goods, Executory Contracts, Judicial Estoppel

Summary:

Sampson County sought to collect $2.6 million from Aaron’s Rent-to-Own for personal property taxes owed for the period from 2010 through 2015 for the property which Aaron’s leased to consumers.  Aaron’s argued that the property was “in the process of being sold” and qualified as inventories under N.C.G.S. § 105-275(34).  The Tax Commission held that by Aaron’s renting the property to third parties, it was not entitled to the exclusion from personal property taxes.

By Ed Boltz, 13 February, 2019

N.C. Court of Appeals- Bryant v. Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C.: Mortgage Lender Has No Duty to Disclose Secret Settlement with Insurance Carrier

Summary:

Mr.  Bryan refinanced his home in 2007, with two mortgages, ultimately held by Nationstar, originally totaling $657,000.  In August 2009, Mr.  Bryant’s home was destroyed by fire, but was fortunately insured for up to $649,000.  By May of 2013, when the home had still apparently not been rebuilt and the insurance proceeds not disposed of, Nationstar brought a “secret lawsuit” against the insurance carrier and settled that suit for $445,000.  Nationstar then commenced foreclosure agains

By Ed Boltz, 4 October, 2018

N.C. Ct. of Appeals: In re Frucella- Lost Mortgage Note

Summary: The Frucellas purchased a home with a mortgage note from The Lotham & Nettleton Co. In 1985. In 1997, a Notice of Substitution of Trustee was filed providing, among other things, that Crestart Bank was the holder of the note.
By Ed Boltz, 1 August, 2018

N.C. Superior Court: Carolina Home Solutions, Inc. v. Crystal Coast Home Solutions - Out-of-State Attorneys cannot Ghostwrite Pleadings

Summary: Charles Loncon, an attorney licensed to practice in Georgia, but not North Carolina, filed a Notice of Appearance to represent Carolina Home Solutions ("CHS"), a corporation, and Charles Boudreau, an individual. The Superior Court initially allowed Loncon to appear at a scheduling conference, but admonished him that he would have to obtain pro hac vice admission going forward and that CHS, as a corporation, could not represent itself pro se.
By Ed Boltz, 9 January, 2018

N.C. Business Court: Bass v. NC Dept. of Revenue- Statute of Limitations for Tax Refund

Summary: Mr. Bass filed his 2012 federal tax return electronically, but unintentionally failed to file his state return. In July 2016, the North Carolina Department of Revenue (“NCDOR”) sent Mr. Bass a Notice of Intent to Assess for Failure to File North Carolina Return (“the Notice”) and then Mr. Bass filed his 2012 return on August 4, 2016, contending a refund was due. The NCDOR denied the refund, as the return was beyond the 3-year statute of limitations. Mr.

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 3
  • Next page
NC Courts

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Book Reviews
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Business Court
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Debt
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.2, © 2013-2025 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved. Follow @edboltz