Â
Summary:
Default Judgment was entered in favor of Ms. Deal for violations of the FDCPA by Trinity Hope Associates, which failed to respond to the Complaint.
Commentary:
The only aspect that is interesting is that this is a 10-page opinion finding default, where the defendant did not answer.
For a copy of the opinion, please see:
Deal v. Trinity Hope Associates, LLC- Default Judgment under FDCPA
Western District
By Ed Boltz, 10 August, 2017
Summary:
Leaving aside the multiple foreclosure proceedings and subsequent appeals, Mr. Garvey eventually filed a short-lived, pro se Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Attorneys for Seterus filed a Notice of Appearance and Objection to Confirmation. Mr. Garvey then sent a demand to the attorneys, as debt collectors, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
By Ed Boltz, 10 August, 2017
Summary:
Ms. Bronikowski disclosed a potential employment bonus in her November 11, 2016, bankruptcy petition, asserting that it was not an asset of her bankruptcy estate, as the award of the bonus was at the complete discretion of the employer, and, in the alternative and out of caution, claimed it as exempt as wages of the debtor under N.C.G.S. § 1-362.
By Ed Boltz, 2 August, 2017
Summary:
Ms. Crow filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, but after a creditor raised issue with her exceeding the §109(g) debt limits, converted to Chapter 7. Eight months after the initial filing of her voluntary bankruptcy petition, Ms. Crow sought to amend her schedules to claim an exemption in an individual retirement account (IRA) that had been omitted from her original petition, but would otherwise indisputably have been exempt. The Trustee opposed this amendment, arguing that Ms.
By Ed Boltz, 31 May, 2017
Summary:
The Trustee sought to abandon LLCs of inconsequential value to avoid tax liabilities of more than $1 million due to recaptured pass through losses. Abandonment of these assets would shift the tax liability to the debtor, who contended that this would improperly burden his fresh start. The bankruptcy court rejected this as the â[i]mpact on the debtor is not ... one of the factors to be considered in authorizing abandonment, which suggests that impact on the debtor is not a necessary
consideration.â In re Johnston, 49 F.3d 538, 541 (9th Cir.
By Ed Boltz, 21 December, 2016
Summary:
Lendmark financed the purchase and installation of an HVAC unit for Ms. Hudginsâ home. All parties agreed that the HVAC unit was a âconsumer goodâ as defined by N.C.G.S. § 25-9-102, that Lendmark held an automatically perfected purchase money security interest in the HVAC as chattel pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 25-9-309(1) and that Lendmark did not record a fixture filing.
The Trustee argued that without the fixture filing Lendmarkâs security interest fell to the hypothetical judgment lien creditor status of bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 544.
By Ed Boltz, 19 December, 2016
Summary:
Mr. and Mrs. Foley each had several life insurance policies which named as the beneficiary a testamentary trust created by virtually identical wills. These directed the estate trustee to use any income and principal from the trust âfor the health, maintenance and supportâ of the surviving spouse or subsequently their son. A later provision, however, authorized the trustee to âcompromise claimsâ.
By Ed Boltz, 11 December, 2016
Summary:
After the filing of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the Debtor found a cashierâs check payable to her ex-husband in the amount of $11,000.00. This check was not listed as an asset in the Debtorâs schedules, but her ex-husband was listed as holding a priority claim for $0.00 for alimony. The Debtor contended that this was for unpaid alimony and her ex-husband, in fact, had the sole allowed DSO priority claim for $15,000.00 in the case.
By Ed Boltz, 17 August, 2016
Summary:
Ms. Banner filed a âbare bonesâ Chapter 13 petition signed by her attorney, Joseph Kosko, who was a local partner in the law firm of Volks Anwalt, which solicited Banner as a client through direct mail. After missing numerous deadlines for filing the completed petition, ultimately the bankruptcy court held multiple contempt hearing regarding the representation by Kosko, Volks Anwalt, and its sole owner and managing partner, Jessica McClean.
By Ed Boltz, 22 June, 2016
Summary:
In her Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, Crawford listed several parcels of real property as âheldâ for other parties, when, in fact, these parcels (and two additional undisclosed parcels) were hers. Crawford also did not disclose in her Statement of Affairs that prior to filing her case, she had received $80,000 in insurance proceeds from a robbery, using $47,500 to pay debts to friends and family.