Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • NC Bankruptcy Cases
    • Eastern District
    • Middle District
    • Western District
  • NC Courts
    • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
    • NC Court of Appeals
    • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • Federal Cases
  • Law Reviews & Studies
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

automatic stay

By Ed Boltz, 13 December, 2021

N.C. Ct. of Appeals: Hedgpeth v. SMCC Clubhouse, LLC- State Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction over matters pending in an Open Bankruptcy Case

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 21 May, 2021

4th Cir.: Wood v. HUD- Tax Refund Offset did not Violation the Automatic Stay

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 15 April, 2021

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Bivens v. NewRez- Misapplication of Payments by Mortgage Servicer

Summary:

By Ed Boltz, 29 March, 2021

Law Review: Moringiello, Juliet M., Automating Repossession (March 15, 2021). Widener Law Commonwealth Research Paper

Abstract:

By Ed Boltz, 5 February, 2019

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: In re Dev- Termination of the Automatic Stay

Summary:

Mrs. Dev had filed three bankruptcy cases, with the second dismissed on September 12, 2017, and the third filed on February 13, 2018, for the purpose, among others, of stopping the foreclosure of her home by Coastal Federal Credit Union. CFCU brought a Motion for Relief arguing that it lacked adequate protection, that the plan was filed in bad faith, was abusive, and part of a scheme to delay, hinder and defraud CFCU. It sought in rem relief for two years. Ms.

By Ed Boltz, 8 October, 2018

Bankr. M.D.N.C.: In re Randle- Default Judgment for Violation of Automatic Stay

Summary:
The Randles fell behind on their car payments and Saga Auto Sales repossessed the Randles’ 2011 Cadillac Escalade.  Upon payment of $2,100, Saga returned the vehicle on December 2, 2017.  With their next payment due on December 9,   2017, the Randles filed Chapter 13 on December 8, 2017.  Saga again repossessed the vehicle on December 10, 2018, also taking possession of Ms.
By Ed Boltz, 25 August, 2017

Bankr. E.D.N.C.: In re Taylor- Private Citizens Enforcing Federal Statutes Not Exempt from the Automatic Stay as Governmental Units

Summary: In a case involving a hog farm and related claims of environmental pollution, Sound Rivers, Inc.’s and Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. sought an order confirming that the automatic stay does not apply or, in the alternative, for relief from the automatic stay in order to continue their lawsuit filed in the federal district Court.
By Ed Boltz, 13 December, 2016

E.D.N.C. and Bankr. E.D.N.C: Jones v. Jones - Characterization and Relief from Stay regarding Equitable Distribution

Summary: Bankruptcy Court Characterization of Equitable Distribution Awards Cheryl Jones brought motions against the Debtor, her ex-husband, Sean Jones, seeking relief from the stay and for determination of Domestic Support Obligation, with the primary question being whether the family court’s Equitable Distribution Order award of $116,182 from the debtor’s 401(k) plan and $63,736 from the debtor’s retirement account were in the nature of a domestic support obligation, pursuant to §§ 101(14A) and 523(a)(5), or
By Ed Boltz, 21 June, 2016

4th Circuit: RDLG, L.L.C. v. Leonard- Default Judgment as Sanction

Summary: RDLG filed suit against Leonard alleging a pattern of fraudulent activity. Attorneys Lankford and Neyhart entered appearances for Leonard and were still attorneys-of-record when the district court set a pre-trial conference for October 3, 2012. On September 30, 2012, Lankford and Neyhart filed a motion seeking to both continue the October 3rd hearing and also to withdraw as counsel, due to both a lack of communication and payment from Leonard.
By Ed Boltz, 23 May, 2014

4th Circuit: BB&T v. Construction Supervision Services- Subcontractor Lien on Funds

Summary: Construction Supervision Services (“CSS”) filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2012, after which several subcontractors, which had previously provided stone, concrete, and fuel to CSS on an open account, sought to serve notice of liens on funds owed by others to CSS, thereby perfecting such liens. BB&T, which had lent CSS money, objected to the Subcontractors’ post-petition notice and perfection, arguing that such actions violated 11 U.S.C.

Pagination

  • 1
  • Next page
automatic stay

About Us

Mountain View The purpose of the NC Bankruptcy Expert blog is to provide legal professionals with a consolidated resource for updates and case summaries about issues and decisions affecting bankruptcy, foreclosures, mortgages, and debt collection.

 
Lawyer Edward Boltz | Top Attorney Chapter 7

NC Bankruptcy Expert FREE Consultation

We Offer A Free Bankruptcy Consultation which has helped over 70,000 North Carolina families. We serve the entire state of North Carolina.

Proud Member of:












Categories

  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • District Courts
  • Eastern District
  • Ed Boltz: Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Federal Cases
  • Forms
  • Home
  • Law Reviews & Studies
  • Middle District
  • Mortgage Modification Mediation Documents
  • NC Court of Appeals
  • NC Courts
  • NC Supreme Court Cases
  • News
  • North Carolina Bankruptcy Cases
  • North Carolina District Court Cases
  • North Carolina Exemptions Legislative History
  • Student Loan Options and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Western District
RSS feed
v. 1.2.0, © 2013-2023 ncbankruptcyexpert.com, all rights reserved.